- Aug 5, 2013
- 1,710
- 1,690
I doubt very very much that wi**on would want to "share" their final asset!...rent..yes, share equally..no!!We need to look at whether we can get a good ground share deal and whether it could be mutually beneficial.
I have no doubt we have been given a "decent" rate for this one off match thanks to Pauls (and lets not forget the other members of the board), negotiations and they have all done what's seen as necessary to get the game done.
But, back to that first line:
1. Wi**on won't share their final asset in an equal split.
2. We couldn't afford to buy even if they would.
3. I, in a personal opinion, wouldn't want to pay them rent on a regular basis as we are just helping them to progress and I doubt it would benefit us enough to cover the extra expense.
4. Its seems funny they didn't want to know us before their recent emergency meeting where they revealed that expenses are bigger than income!...and suddenly, we are a viable option again??!!
5. Renting off wi**on would put us back to the days when most of us followed vics....begging off wi**on!, and would the gains of playing at wi**on out-way the losses!?,I'm not convinced.
Just an observation....A lot of the people on this thread getting excited about playing at wi**on were on here not so long ago saying how low wi**ons morals when taking Vics drug money etc!!, do they suddenly believe wi**on now to be a moral upstanding club who have the interest of 74 at heart?
I think its more to do with point 4 above!