- Jul 28, 2013
- 3,005
- 2,329
Hancock called Neil Ferguson "an eminent and impressive scientist"
Another Hancock lie
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hancock called Neil Ferguson "an eminent and impressive scientist"
Be interesting to know who set up the spy camera and released the pictures and video. Suspect that will be the most interesting part of this incident and that investigation won't be long coming to the front pagesHancock called Neil Ferguson "an eminent and impressive scientist" but said he had to resign for breaching rules - & wanted police to investigate - so how does he justify his position as a hopeless and incompetent Health Secretary?
I agree with you. Anyone know where Dom is? ??Be interesting to know who set up the spy camera and released the pictures and video. Suspect that will be the most interesting part of this incident and that investigation won't be long coming to the front pages
And this is why he is completely useless….I agree with you. Anyone know where Dom is? ??
Doesn’t fundamentally change anything. The man is a lying, cheating hypocrite who isn’t fit to hold high office. Exactly the same as his boss….?
I agree with you. Anyone know where Dom is? ??
Doesn’t fundamentally change anything. The man is a lying, cheating hypocrite who isn’t fit to hold high office. Exactly the same as his boss….?
Whoever decided to leak this to the papers must really hate Hancock. The person also shows complete disregard for the other 3 people in this sorry affair whose lives they have also destroyed, along with their families. No doubt they feel very happy with themselves, but in my view they are as guilty and despicable as Hancock himself.Be interesting to know who set up the spy camera and released the pictures and video. Suspect that will be the most interesting part of this incident and that investigation won't be long coming to the front pages
Whoever decided to leak this to the papers must really hate Hancock.
?????That really narrows it down then!
‘Destroyed’? They are at least still alive, unlike many others who were effectively sent to an early grave by the actions - or inactions - of Halfcock.Whoever decided to leak this to the papers must really hate Hancock. The person also shows complete disregard for the other 3 people in this sorry affair whose lives they have also destroyed, along with their families. No doubt they feel very happy with themselves, but in my view they are as guilty and despicable as Hancock himself.
Hancock was foolish to get involved with one of his aides - but he won't be the first and he won't be the last.‘Destroyed’? They are at least still alive, unlike many others who were effectively sent to an early grave by the actions - or inactions - of Halfcock.
But at last Knutsfordian you appear to be conceding the point that this government are full of people like Hancock - a complete shower of shits.
you're having a laugh, Tory hypocrite caught out and you are looking for another scapegoat to blame. Have you ever heard of cctv surveillance, you can get done for 10 mins overstay at Matalan.Hancock was foolish to get involved with one of his aides - but he won't be the first and he won't be the last.
The bigger question here is who is spying on minsters of state in their own offices and are their meetings being recorded too? The CCTV camera can't have been placed there with ministerial knowledge, otherwise Hancock wouldn't have been so daft as to kiss his aide.
No doubt this will be heralded as whistle blowing by the Sun, who will fight tooth and nail to keep their source safe, but if this film was acquired illegally, then it's almost akin to the phone tapping scandal and no doubt it will end up in the courts. This could have quite some way to run yet
“otherwise Hancock wouldn't have been so daft as to kiss his aide.”Hancock was foolish to get involved with one of his aides - but he won't be the first and he won't be the last.
The bigger question here is who is spying on minsters of state in their own offices and are their meetings being recorded too? The CCTV camera can't have been placed there with ministerial knowledge, otherwise Hancock wouldn't have been so daft as to kiss his aide.
No doubt this will be heralded as whistle blowing by the Sun, who will fight tooth and nail to keep their source safe, but if this film was acquired illegally, then it's almost akin to the phone tapping scandal and no doubt it will end up in the courts. This could have quite some way to run yet
As I said earlier in this thread, “Anyone seen Dom recently?” ??????Hancock was foolish to get involved with one of his aides - but he won't be the first and he won't be the last.
The bigger question here is who is spying on minsters of state in their own offices and are their meetings being recorded too? The CCTV camera can't have been placed there with ministerial knowledge, otherwise Hancock wouldn't have been so daft as to kiss his aide.
No doubt this will be heralded as whistle blowing by the Sun, who will fight tooth and nail to keep their source safe, but if this film was acquired illegally, then it's almost akin to the phone tapping scandal and no doubt it will end up in the courts. This could have quite some way to run yet
I agree Hancock has been caught out and pays the price - but as I said before he won't be the last. And whilst many might be having a jolly good laugh at his demise, it really is small beer compared to what else is being filmed and viewed - and by whom?As I said earlier in this thread, “Anyone seen Dom recently?” ??????
But actually Knutsfordian you do make a valid point. If someone can video a minister supposedly in his own office without his knowledge, then whom else might this be happening to and what information might they have obtained?
Doesn’t get away from the point that Halfcock is a lying, philandering hypocrite - just like his former boss…..
And another Johnson lie ??Another Hancock lie
And another Johnson lie ??
Captain Hindsight? Boris Johnson appears to have changed his story on Matt Hancock's departure
Until now, the line from Downing Street has been that Hancock resigned. But the PM has now suggested that he decided to sack him.news.sky.com
Priti Patel knows all about treating people in a 'fair and equitable way' and 'without breaking those involved and with the minimal amount of rancour'.Bloody hell James - everything that is any way nuanced sits as a lie with you. With all these things there are shades of grey. Price Waterhouse Coopers used to have a way of dispensing with staff known casually as ETL - encouraged to leave. It was a step short of being booted out of the door, but it was made clear your future employment lay elsewhere and technically those those that left ETL were deemed to have resigned. I suspect with Hancock, as in all these things, there are/were conversations that moved the goal posts from allowing Hancock to hang on, to being relieved of his duties. Sometimes its just about treating people in a fair and equitable way that allows the process to be completed without breaking those involved and with the minimal amount of rancour. He has gone. Let it go !
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
Please note that in order to help fund the site we may serve ads by via Google AdSense, and cookies may be used for personalisation of these ads to make them more relevant. These are optional and you can choose to enable/disable any such cookies in your preferences: