Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Desperate times call for desperate measures. Having to do it all themselves now that Rushe's funny money has dried up.JRFC leafleting my house with match day offers. Things must be desperate but at least their suddenly trying!
Desperate times call for desperate measures. Having to do it all themselves now that Rushe's funny money has dried up.
Is a licence was required to post fliers?[/QUOTE
Seem to recall that there is ,Tony !
JRFC leafleting my house with match day offers. Things must be desperate but at least their suddenly trying!
My thoughts aswell, Josh.
It is families for a fiver this Saturday. A good idea but shoddily photocopied onto a scrappy piece of paper.
Is a licence required to post fliers?
I have no doubt that they are trying to live up to Colin's assertion. The latest news on the activities of the con man etc. is that Mr Nuttall has advised the manager of the hostelry conned out of £60 of the following :-Colin also says why wouldn't the people of Northwich want a club that is run by the fans and is open, honest and transparent and lives within its means.
They already have one in 1874.
(Chatting to a Wittoner this morning in town and he told me that he would be surprised if JRFC finish this month never mind the season although I am sure that it will be everyone elses fault)
AlanIs that "fraudulently secured by NVFC" or "fraudulently secured in the name of NVFC"? To me what you describe sounds like the latter.
Alan
Probably both, but I can only report what the pub manager tells me. It seems strange that Mr. Nuttall seems to know the identity of the con man (who now has no apparent connection with the new regime at NVFC) Quite when the connection was severed is presumably known to Mr. Nuttall, but he does not appear willing to divulge when this was. If NVFC are returning the fraudulently obtained monies, it follows that NVFC must have been in receipt of the monies. However, it is possible that NVFC were unaware of the methods used by the con man when the monies were handed over to them.
Alan
Probably both, but I can only report what the pub manager tells me. It seems strange that Mr. Nuttall seems to know the identity of the con man (who now has no apparent connection with the new regime at NVFC) Quite when the connection was severed is presumably known to Mr. Nuttall, but he does not appear willing to divulge when this was. If NVFC are returning the fraudulently obtained monies, it follows that NVFC must have been in receipt of the monies. However, it is possible that NVFC were unaware of the methods used by the con man when the monies were handed over to them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
Please note that in order to help fund the site we may serve ads by via Google AdSense, and cookies may be used for personalisation of these ads to make them more relevant. These are optional and you can choose to enable/disable any such cookies in your preferences: