- Jul 28, 2013
- 67
- 43
JRFC Aftermath
- Thread starter Tony1874
- Start date
- Status
And if they can pass the North West Counties League's scrutiny of their fitness to join. With their record of financial mismanagement, repeated appeals against decisions of various league authorities and dubious sources of income etc, it should be easy for the League to find reason to reject any application from them.
- Dec 11, 2015
- 54
- 71
I think this is a little unfair and the insinuation is that MH is receiving dodgy money and images of brown paper bags spring to mind. Witton Albion FC are receiving rent money from NVFC.
I don't think that we hire private detectives to identify the the source of all incoming money that we receive?
I have never been stopped at Tesco, Sainsburys or at the turnstiles at 1874 and asked to provide a breakdown of where my money came from! So for all we know we could be receiving money from people convicted of drug offences and the money they pay to watch us may be profits from illegal activities. If this was the case then it would be up to the authorities to prove not us.
In fact if MH announced that he could not accept money from NVFC because he thinks it may be profits from illegal activities he could be sued despite the fact that JR has been convicted of drug related activities.
The only thing that MH could do is attempt to end the contract with NVFC but I believe they have already considered that option.
I understand the healthy rivalry we have with but please leave the guy alone, he is one of the good guys in football and so are we so we should concentrate on the bad guys instead of letting our rivalry lead to personal attacks and insinuations.
- Dec 11, 2015
- 54
- 71
- Aug 5, 2013
- 1,710
- 1,690
Don't be silly, it's the modern era......he passes MH money in a recyclable bag, thus saving on costs!!
Btw, if he's one of the good guys we really are screwed!!!
.
- Aug 1, 2013
- 2,939
- 2,085
- Thread starter
- #647
Remember this
What does this mean?
- Jan 9, 2014
- 13
- 19
As JRFC haven't filed their Annual Return they get threatened with being kicked off the companies register. This is quite common as it is a simple form to fill in that companies tend to forget and rarely get properly punished for.
It happened to them last year as you can see here
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06410883/filing-history
The bigger issue is the lack of accounts filed that were due to be filed by 31st July, this will be incurring penalties. Saying that they must be difficult accounts to produce
- Jun 24, 2013
- 3,399
- 2,345
This letter is more than a threat to remove from companies register. The annual return (now called a 'confirmation statement') is a simple tick-box exercise on the Co House website, for which there is no late filing penalty, just a 'slap-wrist' reminder letter.
Failure to file accounts incurs hefty penalties if done in consecutive years - I think it is £750 if this is their second year late, and will double again if over three months late (20 days to go on that aspect). This one is a final final final letter, raising the suspicion that there is more to it than simply "oi, you've not filed your accounts yet"
Failure to file accounts incurs hefty penalties if done in consecutive years - I think it is £750 if this is their second year late, and will double again if over three months late (20 days to go on that aspect). This one is a final final final letter, raising the suspicion that there is more to it than simply "oi, you've not filed your accounts yet"
- Aug 1, 2013
- 2,939
- 2,085
- Thread starter
- #655
Means they are in the shit, again!
- May 16, 2014
- 993
- 617
Is that a technical accountancy term Tony?
- Aug 14, 2013
- 1,896
- 496
Dumped out the Fa Trophy tonight so no extra prize money will be available to them
- Jun 24, 2013
- 3,399
- 2,345
Further clarification (from Co House) ...
When the registrar may strike a company off the register
If a company is neither carrying on business nor operation, the registrar may take action to strike a company off the register.
The registrar may take this action if he has reasonable cause to believe that a company is not carrying on business or in operation. The registrar may take this view if:
Before striking a company off the register, the registrar is required to write two formal letters and send notice to the company’s registered office to inquire whether it is still carrying on business or in operation. If he is satisfied that it is not, he will publish a notice in the relevant Gazette stating his intention to strike the company off the register unless he is shown reason not to do so.
A copy of the notice will be placed on the company’s public record. If the registrar sees no reason to do otherwise, he will strike off the company not less than 2 months after the date of the notice. The company will be dissolved on publication of a further notice stating this in the relevant Gazette.
We appear to be at the stage of the final paragraph.
The alternative is that this is a voluntary strike-off, actioned by the company itself. Interestingly, one of the valid reasons cited for a company applying to be struck off is ...
But in the case of a voluntary strike-off, there is a £10 fee, payable by cheque, which may make people think that is a less likely scenario.
When the registrar may strike a company off the register
If a company is neither carrying on business nor operation, the registrar may take action to strike a company off the register.
The registrar may take this action if he has reasonable cause to believe that a company is not carrying on business or in operation. The registrar may take this view if:
- he has not received company documents that should have been sent to him
- mail that the registrar has sent to a company’s registered office is returned undelivered
- the company has no directors
Before striking a company off the register, the registrar is required to write two formal letters and send notice to the company’s registered office to inquire whether it is still carrying on business or in operation. If he is satisfied that it is not, he will publish a notice in the relevant Gazette stating his intention to strike the company off the register unless he is shown reason not to do so.
A copy of the notice will be placed on the company’s public record. If the registrar sees no reason to do otherwise, he will strike off the company not less than 2 months after the date of the notice. The company will be dissolved on publication of a further notice stating this in the relevant Gazette.
We appear to be at the stage of the final paragraph.
The alternative is that this is a voluntary strike-off, actioned by the company itself. Interestingly, one of the valid reasons cited for a company applying to be struck off is ...
- the company was originally set up to exploit an idea that turned out not to be feasible
But in the case of a voluntary strike-off, there is a £10 fee, payable by cheque, which may make people think that is a less likely scenario.
- Aug 1, 2013
- 2,939
- 2,085
- Thread starter
- #659
Last edited:
- Aug 1, 2013
- 2,939
- 2,085
- Thread starter
- #660
You should be careful Alan or you'll be getting a call from the former owner of Northwich Vice FC on his cellphone
Last edited:
- Status