- Jul 30, 2013
- 1,160
- 1,360
Did the league ask questions of the likes of Fleetwood of whom its chairman pumped in Millions into the club
Don't you support Man United Mr Chubbs of whom are £100's millions in debt depriving other clubs in the land that have no Debt. How much money has Chelsea and Man City's Chairman pumped into their clubs.
Wrong again.
I certainly do not or have ever followed MUFC, if anyone, I used to follow (not support - the two are different in my eyes) Leeds Utd, but became disillusioned with them after the whole Risdale debacle (a rich man's Jim Rushe), but that is another story.
I'm glad you brought up the City, Chelsea, Utd analogy, I was hoping you would. They are multinational companies owned by very rich and powerful people, followed by millions worldwide. They are based in their respective cities but their support comes from much further. On the whole everyone knows where their money comes from. As for Fleetwood they too, know where their money is coming from, it may not last, as with Rushden, but they do know.
Vics are/were a small non-league club with links and relations to the people who it's name was supposed to represent (as is the case with all other non-league clubs). It ceased doing that the minute they upped sticks and left due to the incompetence of owners. Most of the reasonable and sensible supporters saw that as the end of their relationship as they didn't know, and still don't know how they were/are funded and couldn't put their faith in a man who has so much contempt for the people who supported HIS club. If he has all this money to keep them afloat on crowds of 120 whilst challenging for titles for the past 3 years, why couldn't he fund a £600,000 mortgage on the VS? Answer - because he couldn't give assurances of where the money was coming from.
You are a sycophant who cannot fathom that someone in a position of power would be lying to you. You are an idiot.
Last edited: